Skip to main content

The Cubs Have A "Serious Interest" In Carlos Correa



 I'm guilty of getting caught up in potential Cubs rumors, but this one I can say has a little more validity to it. Let's first back up to things that have happened prior to this:

  • Correa was seeking a big deal, apparently big enough that the Tigers shied away from it in favor of Baez. Possibly a record-breaking deal, according to some past sources.
  • Hoyer has mentioned that he is done focusing on pitching and will move to other needy parts of the roster, specifically the infield.
  • It's no secret that the Cubs could use a top-tier shortstop, considering the defense that will be needed and the extra power in the lineup is a need.
  • Correa has mentioned (before the offseason started) that Wrigley is a great place to play and a lot of players would be interested in going there. He separately stated that he wanted to play for a "rebuilding team", something the Cubs are of sorts.
Putting things together before this last big announcement, we can already see some "mutual interest" building. Correa wants a rebuilding team-the Cubs are rebuilding of sorts. The Cubs could use a top-defense shortstop, Correa is a top-defense shortstop. And so forth.

That leads us to the big (or as big as you can get during a lockout) announcement. A source has lately told insider Levine this statement: “The Cubs have the money to sign Correa, however, the only hesitation is about the length of the deal – not the annual average value of the contract.”

This goes along with similar statements made by Levine: "The Cubs have a serious interest in Correa" and "there is mutual interest between Correa and the Cubs"

Ok. A lot to process. Correa is reportedly looking for a 10-year record breaking deal, something the Cubs are somewhat hesitant to do, and I don't blame them. If Correa signed a 10-year deal with the Cubs, he'd be 37 by the time he became a free agent, and before then his defense and offense would be likely declining. I'm certainly not saying the Cubs should sign him to a 1-2 year deal, but I do think that 10 years is a little much.

So, would either the Cubs or Correa compromise? If the Cubs compromised, they would get a shortstop that would be there and really solid when they start competing again (I think as soon as 2023-2024) but would likely be declining in the latter years of his contract. Would it be worth it? 

If Correa compromised, then what would be the lowest he would go? 6-years? 8-years? I would prefer a 5-7 year deal, since he's looking in the long range, but would Correa compromise? What would be in it for him? The Yankees and Dodgers also need a shortstop, and both have money to spend, so why should he compromise and sign with the Cubs?

Well, obviously the Cubs are a better team with a better fanbase, but besides that he has the opportunity to play in front of an amazing fanbase that wants him there and be able to play with another team once he hits his free agency. 

You can view the original tweet here:

 And my tweet:


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reliving the Cubs' 2016 Postseason Highlights

 As we enter the final stretch for baseball in 2021- a Braves/Astros World Series, it's a good time to look back at memorable Cubs' history in 2016, when the Cubs broke a 108 year WS win drought to beat the Indians in the World Series. The Cubs cruised to a 103-58 standing at the end of the season, getting the NL Central pennant and meaning they'd face the winner of the Wild Card, who ended up being the Giants. Game One of the NLDS Jon Lester threw 8 shut-out innings, Chapman closed the 9th with a shut-out against the Giants and Javier Baez solo-homered in the 8th to give the Cubs a 1-0 win against the Giants and get the 1-0 series lead. Game Two of the NLDS Kyle Hendricks started the game, only allowing 2 runs, and he drove in 2 runs himself in the 2nd with a single, but he left the game in the 3rd due to a line-drive injury. Reliever Travis Wood replaced Hendricks, and hit a home run, yes a home run in the 4th to give the Cubs a 5-2 lead. That was the first homer to be hi...
2 comments
Read more

Articles Coming Again to Cubbies Gazette?

It's been awhile Cubs fans. I've been pretty active on Twitter, so if you haven't yet, give me a follow there. There's plenty of Cubs blogs out there, with my personal favorite being Bleacher Nation. So I don't intend to just repeat or say the same things others are saying, but I want to provide my thoughts on certain things that might differ or be new to Cubs fans.  Basically, I want to write brief articles on different Cubs related topics that might be new or original. This is just a hobby for me, so don't expect articles every single day. I'll also be sharing some thoughts of others from Twitter that I found interesting. If you're interested in writing for Cubbies Gazette, DM me on Twitter or email me at cubbiesgazette@gmail.com. Thanks for all of your support on Twitter, and as always, GO CUBS GO!
1 comment
Read more

Evaluating the Cubs' Defense

  Just to start off, it was good to see the Braves beat the Dodgers, and even more satisfying seeing it was a walk-off hit by Austin Riley. Still hoping for a Red Sox/Braves World Series- it'd be a nice change of pace. Anyway, back to our topic for today: The Cubs' Defense. Overall ranking for defensive efficiency, the Cubs ranked no.20, just ahead of the Marlins and just behind the Twins, so certainly not good, but hey, the Cubs aren't number 30! Since a lot of fielding stats are confusing and probably won't mean much to you, I'm just going to highlight a few areas and explain them in everyday terms. 1. Shortstop and Second were a BIG Problem. A total of 41 errors of the teams' 87 errors were made at second or shortstop. That's almost half of the teams' errors at two positions! Javier Baez made an obnoxious total of 18 errors at shortstop before he left (strange for a guy who was a gold glove finalist in 2020), and Sergio Alcantara made 9 errors in his ...
Post a Comment
Read more